Long v. Murray County School District

2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86155 (2012)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Long v. Murray County School District

United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86155 (2012)

Facts

Tyler Lee Long was a student at Murray County High School. Long was diagnosed with Asperger’s syndrome and had an individualized education program (IEP) pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). At school, Long faced substantial bullying. Peers routinely called Long names, shoved and kicked him, knocked books out of his hands, and taunted him both in his classes and in public spaces such as the cafeteria. Long also suffered from more severe, isolated instances of bullying, such as a peer spitting in Long’s food, a peer hitting Long across the face, a peer rubbing his genitals against Long, and a teacher referring to Long as “leave me alone Long” during roll call. Witnesses testified that Long’s bullies targeted Long because he was autistic. Long’s mother reported many of these incidents to school officials. Every time they were apprised of a particular incident, school officials took some form of remedial action such as meeting with Long’s teachers, disciplining offending students, or assigning staff members to accompany Long. However, the remedial actions did not eliminate the bullying. Long’s parents (plaintiffs) noticed that Long began wearing adult diapers at home and, on one occasion, saw Long hanging his belts in a strange fashion such that Long’s parents suspected Long of contemplating suicide. Long’s parents did not inform the school of this behavior. One evening, Long committed suicide by hanging himself from a belt in his closet. Long’s parents sued the school and the Murray County School District (district) (defendant) under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act (§ 504), arguing that the school and the district were liable for their inadequate responses to the bullying Long suffered. The school and district moved for summary judgment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Murphy, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership