Long v. Provide Commerce, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
200 Cal.Rptr.3d 117 (2016)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Each page of Provide Commerce Inc.’s (defendant) website, ProFlowers.com, included on the bottom a hyperlink to Provide’s terms of use. The terms of use included a compelled-arbitration clause. Website users were not required to click on the hyperlink or otherwise read or assent to the terms of use to complete a transaction. To complete an order on the website, the user was required to fill out certain fields contained in a big white box in the middle of the page and to click “Submit” within the same box. The background of the webpage was lime green. The terms of use hyperlink appeared in light green font in the lime green background, below the white box. The hyperlink was among other items in the lime green area, such as a VeriSign Secured logo and a hyperlink to the website’s privacy policy. Brett Long (plaintiff) filed a class-action consumer-fraud suit against Provide. Long claimed, and Provide did not dispute, that Long did not have actual knowledge of the terms of use. Provide filed a petition to compel arbitration based on the terms of use. The trial court denied the petition. Provide appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Jones, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.