Long v. Wilkie

33 Vet. App. 167 (2020)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Long v. Wilkie

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
33 Vet. App. 167 (2020)

Facts

Walter G. Long (plaintiff) served in the US Air Force and spent several years repairing air-traffic-control radar and working close to active runways without ear protection. Long filed a claim for service-connected disability for hearing loss. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) (defendant) granted Long’s claim but gave him a noncompensable rating. Long appealed and asked that the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (the board) refer the claim for extraschedular consideration, claiming that Long’s hearing loss was causing functional effects not considered by the VA’s rating criteria for hearing-loss disabilities. Long claimed these effects included anxiety, depression, decreased self-esteem, interference with ability to work, ear pain, and speech discrimination. A VA examiner found that Long’s mental-health issues were likely unrelated to hearing loss and that Long did not have a diagnosable disorder recognized by the Diagnostic and Statistics Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition (DSM-5). The board denied Long’s claims, concluding that the effects claimed by Long were not unusual for a person with a hearing-loss disability and did not warrant extraschedular consideration. Long appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Toth, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership