Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Longman v. Food Lion, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
197 F.3d 675 (1999)


Facts

On November 5, 1992, ABC reported on various labor and sanitation practices of Food Lion, Inc. (Food Lion) (defendant). The report stated that Food Lion employees often worked off-the-clock and engaged in practices resulting in unsanitary conditions. The report focused on three of Food Lion’s 1,000 stores and interviewed 70 of its 100,000 current and former employees. The day after the report, Food Lion’s Class A stock dropped 11 percent and its Class B stock dropped 14 percent. David Longman and other individuals (plaintiffs) who had purchased Food Lion stock prior to the report brought a class action suit, claiming that Food Lion’s earnings were artificially inflated due to the company’s false representations and omissions regarding its compliance with labor laws and the cleanliness of its stores. During the class period, Food Lion made several public statements about the cleanliness of its stores and its employees' good pay and benefits. Many of these claims were in response to charges made the previous year by the United Food and Commercial Workers Union (Union), which had filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Labor in September 1991, alleging many of the same labor conditions described in ABC's report. Food Lion stock had been unaffected by the Union's complaint. The district court ruled in favor of Food Lion, finding that its statements and omissions were not material. Longman appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Niemeyer, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.