Longman v. Food Lion, Inc.

197 F.3d 675 (1999)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Longman v. Food Lion, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
197 F.3d 675 (1999)

SC
Play video

Facts

On November 5, 1992, ABC reported on various labor and sanitation practices of Food Lion, Inc. (Food Lion) (defendant). The report stated that Food Lion employees often worked off-the-clock and engaged in practices resulting in unsanitary conditions. The report focused on three of Food Lion’s 1,000 stores and interviewed 70 of its 100,000 current and former employees. The day after the report, Food Lion’s Class A stock dropped 11 percent and its Class B stock dropped 14 percent. David Longman and other individuals (plaintiffs) who had purchased Food Lion stock prior to the report brought a class action suit, claiming that Food Lion’s earnings were artificially inflated due to the company’s false representations and omissions regarding its compliance with labor laws and the cleanliness of its stores. During the class period, Food Lion made several public statements about the cleanliness of its stores and its employees' good pay and benefits. Many of these claims were in response to charges made the previous year by the United Food and Commercial Workers Union (Union), which had filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Labor in September 1991, alleging many of the same labor conditions described in ABC's report. Food Lion stock had been unaffected by the Union's complaint. The district court ruled in favor of Food Lion, finding that its statements and omissions were not material. Longman appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Niemeyer, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 748,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 748,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 748,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership