Loomis v. Amazon.com LLC
California Court of Appeal
63 Cal. App. 5th 466, 277 Cal.Rptr.3d 769 (2021)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
Kisha Loomis (plaintiff) ordered a hoverboard from Amazon.com LLC (Amazon) (defendant). Although the hoverboard was purchased through Amazon’s online marketplace, it was sold by Chinese company TurnUpUp and shipped by Forrinx Technology (USA), Inc. (Forrinx) (defendant). Loomis had no contact with TurnUpUp or Forrinx. Instead, Loomis interacted exclusively with Amazon regarding both payment and questions about delivery. Before remitting Loomis’s payment to TurnUpUp, Amazon deducted its usual fees, including a referral fee for connecting sellers with consumers. While the hoverboard was charging in Loomis’s bedroom, it caught fire. Loomis sustained injuries to her hand and foot while putting it out. She filed a strict-products-liability suit against Forrinx, Amazon, and multiple unidentified parties (defendants). Amazon moved for summary judgment, arguing that because it was not the hoverboard’s manufacturer or seller, it was not liable. The trial court granted Amazon’s motion, and Loomis appealed to the California Court of Appeal.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ohta, J.)
Concurrence (Wiley, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.