Looney v. Farmers Home Administration
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
794 F.2d 310 (1986)
- Written by Samantha Arena, JD
Facts
The McCords (defendants) purchased property from the Looneys (plaintiffs) for $250,000, under a conditional land sales contract requiring the McCords to make annual payments of $23,280, including interest, as well as to pay taxes, insurance, and maintenance expenses. Thereafter, the McCords obtained a loan for $183,000 from Farmers Home Administration (the administration) (defendant). In order to secure the loan, the McCords granted the administration a mortgage subject to the sales contract. After making interest payments to the Looneys totaling $123,280, the McCords defaulted. At the time, the outstanding balance on the contract price was $249,360. The Looneys filed suit against the McCords and the administration, seeking forfeiture of the contract. The government sought leave to file a counterclaim for foreclosure of the mortgage, claiming that the property had appreciated in value to $455,000. The district court denied the government’s motion, concluding that, because the McCords still owed $249,360 on the base $250,000 purchase price, the McCords equity in the property totaled only $640, or 0.26 percent of the price. On this basis, the court found that forfeiture was proper, awarding the administration $640 and extinguishing the mortgage. The administration appealed, contending that foreclosure, rather than forfeiture, was the appropriate remedy.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cudahy, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.