From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...
Lopez v. Clifford Law Offices
Illinois Appellate Court
841 N.E.2d 465 (2005)
Jose Lopez (plaintiff) hired Clifford Law Offices, P.C. (Clifford) (defendant) to represent him in a wrongful-death action against a school district after his daughter drowned in a school-district pool. Six months after Lopez’s daughter’s death, Clifford attorney Thomas Prindable (defendant) sent Lopez a letter notifying him that Clifford was ending its representation. The letter also stated that the statute of limitations for Lopez’s claim was two years and that Lopez should find a new attorney immediately. A month later, Lopez consulted with attorney Joseph Loran, but Loran declined to represent Lopez. Loran warned Lopez that a statute of limitations might limit Lopez’s time to bring his claim, although Loran did not state what the time limit was. Thirteen months after his daughter’s death, Lopez consulted with another attorney and learned that the statute of limitations for his claim was only one year because the defendant was a municipal entity. Lopez’s new attorney attempted to file the lawsuit anyway, but it was dismissed as time-barred. Lopez sued Clifford and Prindable for legal malpractice, contending that he had lost his wrongful-death claim because he relied on Prindable’s statement about the two-year statute of limitations during his search for a new attorney. Clifford moved to dismiss the claim, arguing that Lopez still had a viable claim when their relationship ended, and that Lopez’s consultation with Loran was a superseding cause that broke the causal chain and absolved Clifford of liability. The trial court dismissed the claim, and Lopez appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Gordon, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 604,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 604,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.