Loretto Heights College v. National Labor Relations Board
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
742 F.2d 1245 (1984)
- Written by Jennifer Flinn, JD
Facts
Loretto Heights College (plaintiff) was a small liberal arts college in Colorado. The college’s faculty participation in college governance was mostly through participation in a variety of committees. These committees made recommendations to the appropriate officer, dean, or college president. College officials or the board of trustees made the final decisions concerning almost all issues. Many faculty committees met infrequently, if at all, and the college administration did not always follow their recommendations. In 1972, the Loretto Heights College/Faculty Education Association (the association) was certified as the collective-bargaining representative for all faculty. The college and the association entered into several collective-bargaining agreements. At the expiration of the last agreement, the college withdrew its recognition of the association and refused to negotiate with the association. The association filed a complaint against the college with the National Labor Relations Board (defendant). The college argued that its faculty members were managerial employees and were excluded under the National Labor Relations Act. An administrative-law judge rejected this argument and ruled in favor of the association. The National Labor Relations Board affirmed this decision, and the college appealed to the Tenth Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Seymour, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

