From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...
Los Angeles Police Department v. United Reporting Publishing Corp.
United States Supreme Court
528 U.S. 32 (1999)
Facts
A California law required members of the public seeking access to an arrestee’s address to disclose the purpose of the request and to state that the requestor would not use the address to sell something. The law limited access to five delineated purposes: scholarly, journalistic, political, governmental, and investigation by a licensed investigator. There was no such restriction on the disclosure of arrestees’ names. United Reporting Publishing Co. (United) (plaintiff) catalogued names and addresses of arrestees to sell to attorneys, insurance companies, and other clients. The Los Angeles Police Department (defendant) denied United access to certain arrestee address information based on the law. United brought suit, alleging that the law violated the First Amendment. The district court ruled that the statute was facially invalid. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed, employing the First Amendment’s overbreadth doctrine. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, C.J.)
Concurrence (Ginsburg, J.)
Dissent (Stevens, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 602,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
