Losee v. Clute

51 N.Y. 494 (1873)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Losee v. Clute

New York Court of Appeals
51 N.Y. 494 (1873)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

A steam boiler owned and being used by the Saratoga Paper Company (Saratoga) (defendant) at its mill exploded and caused damage to the adjacent property owned by Hervey Losee (plaintiff). Losee brought an action against Saratoga; two of Saratoga’s trustees and agents (defendants); and the manufacturer of the boiler, Cadwallader Clute, and others (collectively, Clute) (defendants). Losee alleged that the boiler was constructed of poor iron and in a negligent and defective manner. The trial testimony showed that Clute knew at the time the boiler was constructed that it would be used adjacent to homes and stores and if it exploded would likely harm people and adjacent property. Saratoga tested the boiler before accepting it and used it for about three months before the explosion. Clute was not involved in caring for or managing the boiler at the time it exploded. The complaint as to Clute was dismissed at the close of the evidence. The judgment was affirmed on appeal. Losee appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lott, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership