Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Loth v. Truck-A-Way Corp.

California Court of Appeal
70 Cal. Rptr.2d 571 (1998)


Facts

Shereen Loth (plaintiff) was on a business trip driving on an interstate highway when her vehicle was struck by a 24-wheel tractor-trailer rig owned by Truck-A-Way Corporation (Truck-A-Way) (defendant), pushed sideways across three lanes of traffic, and struck by another car. Loth filed suit against Truck-A-Way and the driver of the truck for personal injuries, property damage, and lost earnings. Defendants conceded liability and the only issue at trial was the amount of damages. At trial, evidence was presented that prior to the accident, Loth worked long hours as a waitress, played sports, and exercised daily. After the accident, however, at the age of 27, Loth could no longer work as a waitress, could not play sports or participate in other physical activities without being in constant pain. Loth asked for $208,479 in special damages, comprised of past and future medical costs of $27,635; temporary lost earnings of $147,675, and property damage and miscellaneous expenses of $3,507. [Those figures do not total $208,479, but that is what the jury was told orally and in writing.] Loth also presented expert Stanley Smith, an economist who provided testimony on hedonic damages. Smith testified that an average person’s remaining 44-year life expectancy was worth $2.3 million. Smith then adjusted the figure to account for Loth’s longer-than-average remaining life expectancy of 53 years. Smith then multiplied the adjusted baseline figure by various percentages reflecting Loth’s possible degrees of disability to calculate hedonic damage awards: a 33 percent loss of enjoyment would be worth over $1.6 million; a 10 percent loss would be worth $510,000; and a 5 percent loss would be worth $255,000. Smith provided the jury a table to assist it in making its mathematical calculations. Truck-A-Way did not refute Smith’s testimony. The jury held for Loth and awarded her $890,000 in damages. Truck-A-Way appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Ortega, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 177,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.