Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. Warner Brothers Entertainment Inc.

868 F. Supp. 2d 172 (2012)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
L
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. Warner Brothers Entertainment Inc.

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
868 F. Supp. 2d 172 (2012)

SC

Facts

Warner Brothers Entertainment Inc. (defendant) produced the movie “The Hangover: Part II.” In a scene at an airport, Alan, one of the characters, placed a Diophy bag on the seat next to him. Another character moved the bag to make room for a third character to sit. In response, Alan said: “Careful that is . . . that is a Lewis Vuitton.” Alan pronounced the word with the English pronunciation “Lewis,” as opposed to the French pronunciation “Louis.” Diophy bags were knockoffs of bags made by Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. (plaintiff), the world-famous company. Louis Vuitton sued Warner for, among other things, false designation of origin and unfair competition under section 43(a) of the Lanham Act. Louis Vuitton argued that many viewers of the movie believed that the Diophy bag was actually a Louis Vuitton bag. Warner moved for a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim on which relief could be granted.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Carter, Jr., J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 804,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Trademark

Key Terms