Louisiana State Bar Association v. Amberg

573 So. 2d 1093 (1991)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Louisiana State Bar Association v. Amberg

Louisiana Supreme Court
573 So. 2d 1093 (1991)

Facts

Joseph Amberg (defendant) was licensed to practice law in Louisiana. Amberg accepted retainers, i.e., advance payments for services, from three separate clients for three separate matters, and accepted a fourth client on a contingency-fee basis. Amberg did no work or only some work on these matters. Each of the four clients repeatedly called Amberg’s office for updates or information, but Amberg never returned their calls or provided updates. Eventually, the three clients each requested refunds of their retainers, and all four clients requested copies of their files. Amberg did not provide any of the refunds or files. Each of these four clients and a fifth client complained to the state’s bar association (plaintiff) about Amberg. Amberg did not respond to many of the bar association’s communications, nor did he adequately cooperate with the bar association’s efforts to investigate the complaints. The bar association filed disciplinary actions against Amberg with the Louisiana Supreme Court regarding these five clients’ complaints, and those actions were combined into one matter. The bar alleged that Amberg had violated several ethical duties, including his client duties of diligence and communication and his bar duty of cooperating with an investigation. Amberg claimed that he had finally refunded one client’s retainer, but he admitted he had not refunded the other two. At a hearing on the misconduct allegations, Amberg claimed that his personal life had been a mess for several years as he went through a divorce, lost his house in the divorce, moved offices, had a fire at his new office that destroyed files, and dealt with his ex-wife trying to commit suicide. Amberg admitted that he had not been diligent about returning client phone calls or bar communications during this time period. In a separate disciplinary matter, Amberg had been recently suspended from practicing law for three years for mishandling client funds during this same period of personal turmoil. The court considered whether to discipline Amberg.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Marcus, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership