Love v. Weeco™
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
774 Fed. Appx. 519 (2019)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Irvin Love (plaintiff) bought a Weeco™ hoverboard through Amazon.com, Inc. (together, defendants). The packaging contained no warnings about potential fire risks. The hoverboard’s lithium-ion battery started a fire, injuring Love and destroying his home. Love sued the companies involved in making, importing, and advertising the hoverboard. He claimed Amazon was negligent under Georgia state law for advertising and selling Chinese-manufactured hoverboards known to cause fires. Specifically, Love alleged that several fires resulted from lithium-ion batteries in hoverboards from China, including the model Love bought, and U.S. custom authorities had seized thousands of hoverboards as a result. Love alleged that when he bought his hoverboard, Amazon already had written notice of four fires caused by hoverboards it sold. However, Love’s complaint did not say which hoverboard models Amazon had been notified about. Amazon moved to dismiss Love’s failure-to-warn claims, arguing that Love had not sufficiently pled that Amazon had notice of the danger. The trial court dismissed the claims against Amazon, and Love appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.