Logourl black
From our private database of 13,000+ case briefs...

Loveless v. Diehl

Supreme Court of Arkansas
364 S.W.2d 317 (1963)


Facts

The Lovelesses (defendants) owned a farm, which they leased to the Diehls (plaintiffs) for a three-year term. The lease agreement contained an option to allow the Diehls to purchase the property for $21,000 at any time during the lease term. The Diehls expended approximately $5,000 in improvements upon the land during the lease term. Mr. Diehl also purchased equipment from Mr. Loveless, for which a promissory note was executed, but never paid. The Diehls were not able to buy the property themselves. However, just before the option expired, the Diehls entered into an agreement with Dr. Hart, who agreed to purchase the property for a total of $22,000, paying $21,000 to the Lovelesses and $1,000 to the Diehls. The Lovelesses interfered with that agreement, telling Dr. Hart that they did not intend to sell the property to the Diehls. The agreement with Dr. Hart fell through and the $21,000 was not offered to the Lovelesses for the property. The Diehls removed some possessions from the property, but not until after the end of the lease term. The Lovelesses took forcible possession of the property. The Diehls filed suit against the Lovelesses in the chancery court, seeking specific performance of the option or, in the alternative, damages. The Lovelesses counterclaimed for the note regarding the equipment and for the balance of rent. The trial court awarded the Diehls specific performance and damages and awarded the Lovelesses damages on the note. Both parties appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Smith, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Dissent (McFaddin, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Dissent (Harris, C.J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 129,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,000 briefs, keyed to 176 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.