Lovell v. Ohio Wesleyan University
Ohio Court of Appeals
970 N.E.2d 1163 (2012)
- Written by Mike Begovic, JD
Facts
Alison Lovell (plaintiff) was hired as an assistant professor in the Department of Humanities and Classics at Ohio Wesleyan University (Ohio Wesleyan) (defendant). After three consecutive one-year terms, Lovell was evaluated for reappointment and, despite having high marks from students, was informed she would not be receiving a contract for the upcoming year. Ohio Wesleyan cited Lovell’s lack of collegiality as the main reason her reappointment was denied. Lovell had not participated in committees and objected to teacher observations. Lovell’s contract incorporated the faculty handbook (the handbook), which set out a list of criteria to be used and specified the weight each should be accorded. The criteria and proper weight to be accorded were: (1) teaching, 60 percent; (2) scholarship, 30 percent; and (3) service, 10 percent. After losing in the administrative-appeal process, Level sued Ohio Wesleyan for breach of contract, arguing that it improperly considered collegiality in her reappointment decision in violation of her contract. Ohio Wesleyan argued that collegiality, although not explicitly mentioned as a criterion, related to all three factors mentioned in the handbook. A trial court sided with Ohio Wesleyan, concluding that it could properly consider collegiality. Lovell appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gwin, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 990 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.