From our private database of 30,900+ case briefs...
Lovenheim v. Iroquois Brands, Ltd.
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
618 F. Supp. 554 (1985)
Peter Lovenheim (plaintiff) was a shareholder in Iroquois Brands, Ltd. (Iroquois) (defendant). Iroquois was preparing to send proxy materials to its shareholders containing information about a shareholders meeting. Lovenheim sought to include in the proxy materials a proposed resolution that he planned to offer at the meeting. The resolution pertained to the allegedly inhumane procedures used to force-feed geese for production of pate de foie gras in France, which was a type of pate imported by Iroquois. Iroquois refused to include information on Lovenheim’s resolution in the proxy materials. Iroquois defended its refusal based on the SEC rule that a corporation may omit a proposal from its proxy statement “if the proposal relates to operations which account for less than 5 percent of [Iroquois’s] total assets at the end of its most recent fiscal year . . . and is not otherwise significantly related to [Iroquois’s] business.” Pate accounted for well less than 5 percent of Iroquois’s business. However, Lovenheim maintained that his proposal could not be excluded because of the second part of the rule in that it cannot be said that the proposal is not otherwise significantly related to Iroquois’s business. Lovenheim argued that the proposal had ethical or social significance.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Gasch, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 553,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 553,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 30,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.