Loving & Associates v. Carothers

619 N.W.2d 782 (2000)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Loving & Associates v. Carothers

Minnesota Court of Appeals
619 N.W.2d 782 (2000)

  • Written by Heather Whittemore, JD

Facts

Lake Street Shirts (Lake Street) was a screen-printing company incorporated in 1989 by Gibson Carothers (defendant) and Herbert Flick. Carothers owned 26 percent of Lake Street but was not involved in its everyday business. Loving & Associates (Loving) extended a line of credit to Lake Street. To obtain Lake Street’s credit, Carothers signed a personal guaranty securing all money owed to Loving by Lake Street. The personal guaranty was a continuing guaranty and could only be revoked in writing to Loving. The guaranty did not contemplate a merger between Lake Street and another corporation. In 1992 Lake Street merged with Stafford Blaine Designs, forming Stafford-Blaine Designs. Carothers had no say in the merger and was given a 12 percent ownership interest in Stafford-Blaine. Though it ceased to exist as a separate corporate entity, Lake Street continued operating as usual, and Loving continued to extend it credit. In 1998 Stafford-Blaine sold its assets. Loving filed a lawsuit in Minnesota state court against Carothers under his personal guaranty, seeking approximately $38,000 borrowed by Lake Street in 1995. Carothers filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that the merger discharged his obligations under the personal guaranty. The district court granted summary judgment for Carothers, holding that the merger discharged Carothers’s obligation under the guaranty and that the guaranty only covered the debts acquired by the original Lake Street. Loving appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lansing, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership