Loving v. Nicholson

19 Vet. App. 96 (2005)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Loving v. Nicholson

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
19 Vet. App. 96 (2005)

Facts

Herman L. Loving, Jr. (plaintiff) served in the US Army. Thirty years later, while Loving was at a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) clinic, a metal ceiling grate fell on Loving. Loving notified the VA of intent to file a claim based on being injured while being seen at a VA clinic, complaining of knee pain. The regional office (RO) denied Loving’s claim. Loving appealed to the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (the board). The board denied Loving’s claim on the ground that the injury was not related to the provision of medical care by the VA outpatient facility. Loving appealed. On appeal, Loving argued that the board had not made a finding regarding whether the event that caused Loving’s injury was reasonably foreseeable, as it was required to do by the relevant law.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hagel, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership