Lovisi v. Slayton

539 F.2d 349 (1976)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Lovisi v. Slayton

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
539 F.2d 349 (1976)

  • Written by Haley Gintis, JD

Facts

Aldo and Margaret Lovisi (defendants) were convicted of violating a Virginia sodomy statute that prohibited oral sex after one of Margaret’s adolescent daughters from a previous marriage took a sexually explicit photo to school. The incident resulted in the state obtaining a search warrant, which revealed hundreds of sexually explicit photos. Among the photos, were images of Aldo and Margaret engaging in oral sex with another man, Earl Romeo Dunn, who had answered an advertisement the Lovisis had placed in a swingers magazine. At trial, Margaret’s daughters testified that they took the pictures while the three adults engaged in sexual activities. However, Aldo and Dunn testified that the daughters were never present in the bedroom and that they had used a self-timer feature to take the pictures. Although the district judge did not believe the daughters’ testimony, the Lovisis were found guilty of violating the sodomy statute over the Lovisis argument that the statute was unconstitutional because it violated their fundamental right to privacy. The Lovisis appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Haynsworth, C.J.)

Dissent (Craven, J.)

Dissent (Winter, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership