Low v. LinkedIn Corporation

900 F. Supp. 2d 1010 (2012)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Low v. LinkedIn Corporation

United States District Court for the Northern District of California
900 F. Supp. 2d 1010 (2012)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

LinkedIn was a social-networking website for professionals. LinkedIn assigned to each registered user a unique identification number (ID). Kevin Low and Alan Masand (plaintiffs) brought a putative class action against LinkedIn Corporation (defendant) on behalf of all persons in the United States who registered for LinkedIn services after a certain date. Low and Masand alleged that LinkedIn, acting as a remote computing service (RCS), allowed users’ browsing history and LinkedIn IDs to be transmitted to third parties, including advertisers, marketing companies, data brokers, and web-tracking companies, through the use of cookies—website data stored on a user’s computer and resent to the website’s server each time the user accesses it—in violation of the Stored Communications Act (SCA). LinkedIn moved to dismiss the SCA claim on the grounds that LinkedIn was not acting as an RCS when it disclosed LinkedIn IDs and URLs of viewed pages to third parties.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Koh, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 833,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 833,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 833,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership