Low v. LinkedIn Corporation
United States District Court for the Northern District of California
900 F. Supp. 2d 1010 (2012)
- Written by Sharon Feldman, JD
Facts
LinkedIn was a social-networking website for professionals. LinkedIn assigned to each registered user a unique identification number (ID). Kevin Low and Alan Masand (plaintiffs) brought a putative class action against LinkedIn Corporation (defendant) on behalf of all persons in the United States who registered for LinkedIn services after a certain date. Low and Masand alleged that LinkedIn, acting as a remote computing service (RCS), allowed users’ browsing history and LinkedIn IDs to be transmitted to third parties, including advertisers, marketing companies, data brokers, and web-tracking companies, through the use of cookies—website data stored on a user’s computer and resent to the website’s server each time the user accesses it—in violation of the Stored Communications Act (SCA). LinkedIn moved to dismiss the SCA claim on the grounds that LinkedIn was not acting as an RCS when it disclosed LinkedIn IDs and URLs of viewed pages to third parties.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Koh, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 833,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.