Lowell v. Mother's Cake & Cookie Co.

144 Cal. Rptr. 664 (1978)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
L
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Lowell v. Mother’s Cake & Cookie Co.

Court of Appeal of California
144 Cal. Rptr. 664 (1978)

SC

Facts

Fred Lowell (plaintiff) was the sole owner of Lowell Freight Lines, Inc. (the Company). The Company had performed delivery services for Mother’s Cake & Cookie Company (MCCC) (defendant) for over five years. This business accounted for approximately 40 percent of the Company’s income. Lowell sought to sell the Company and received multiple offers. One of the offers was for $200,000 but was conditioned on the Company’s maintaining its business relationship with MCCC. MCCC told the prospective buyer that its contract with the Company would terminate if Lowell sold the Company. As a result of this, the potential buyer, along with other offerors, withdrew. MCCC then bought the Company for $17,400. Lowell brought suit against MCCC for intentional interference with prospective business advantage, claiming that MCCC’s intention was to drive down the market price of the Company so that MCCC could purchase the Company for itself. The trial court dismissed the complaint, finding that MCCC’s interference was justified. Lowell appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kane, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 802,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Torts

Key Terms