Lubin v. Panish
United States Supreme Court
415 U.S. 709 (1974)
- Written by Heather Whittemore, JD
Facts
California (defendant) required all candidates for federal, state, and county elections to pay nonrefundable filing fees to appear on a ballot. Candidates for county-supervisor positions were required to pay a filing fee of $701.60. Write-in candidates were also required to pay the filing fees. There were no alternatives to the filing fees. If a candidate could not pay the fee, he could not appear on the ballot. Donald Lubin (plaintiff) wanted to run for county supervisor but was unable to pay the filing fee. Lubin filed a lawsuit in state court alleging that California’s filing-fee requirement violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and the First Amendment to the United States Constitution by preventing him and other indigent people from running for office. California justified its filing-fee requirement as a means of preventing unserious candidates from overcrowding ballots and confusing voters. The California Supreme Court upheld California’s filing-fee requirement as a valid means of limiting ballot access. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Burger, C.J.)
Concurrence (Blackmun, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.