From our private database of 26,900+ case briefs...
Lucas v. North Texas Lumber
United States Supreme Court
281 U.S. 11 (1930)
On December 27, 1916, North Texas Lumber (NTL) (plaintiff) offered Southern Pine Company a 10-day option to purchase NTL’s assets. On December 30, 1916, Southern Pine notified NTL that it would accept the option, thereby creating an executory contract. On January 5, 1917, NTL delivered the necessary documents and the transaction closed. NTL used accrual-based accounting and thus reported the purchase price on its 2016 federal income tax return. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant) determined that the income was taxable for 1917, not 1916. NTL appealed because if the income were taxable for 1916, NTL’s tax burden would have been significantly less. The Board of Tax Appeals affirmed. The court of appeals reversed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Butler, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 541,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 26,900 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.