Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council
United States Supreme Court
505 U.S. 1003 (1992)
- Written by Megan Petersen, JD
Facts
In 1986, David Lucas (plaintiff) paid $975,000 for two residential lots on the Isle of Palms in South Carolina. The lots consisted of beachfront property on which Lucas intended to build single-family homes. In 1988, however, South Carolina enacted the Beachfront Management Act, which barred Lucas from building any permanent habitable structures on his two lots. Lucas brought suit against the South Carolina Coastal Council (defendant) in the South Carolina Court of Common Pleas on the grounds that the act constituted a taking of his property for a public use that required just compensation under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. The court found that the act rendered Lucas’s property completely valueless and thus the application of the act constituted a taking of Lucas’s property that required payment of just compensation. It awarded damages, and the South Carolina Coastal Council appealed. The South Carolina Supreme Court reversed, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Scalia, J.)
Concurrence (Kennedy, J.)
Dissent (Stevens, J.)
Dissent (Blackmun, J.)
Dissent (Souter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 778,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.