Luis Ischiu v. Gomez Garcia
United States District Court for the District of Maryland
2017 WL 3500403 (2017)
- Written by Haley Gintis, JD
Facts
Guatemala natives William Estuardo Luis Ischiu (plaintiff) and Nely del Rosario Gomez Garcia (defendant) married and had one child. Garcia endured significant sexual and physical abuse by Ischiu and his family. Eventually, Garcia escaped with the child and obtained a Guatemalan protective order called a security-measures order against Ischiu. Ischiu violated the order by appearing at the Garcia family home making death threats aimed at Garcia. Following Ischiu’s threats, Garcia’s family sent Garcia and the child to the United States. In response, Ischiu filed a petition in federal district court seeking the return of the child pursuant to the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (Hague Convention). Ischiu argued that Garcia wrongfully removed the child from Guatemala. Garcia argued that the child had not been wrongfully removed, because Ischiu had lost his custody rights pursuant to the security-measures order. Alternatively, Garcia argued that the child, who was six years old, was mature enough to make his own decision about returning to Guatemala. Garcia also argued that there was a grave risk that the child would suffer physical and psychological harm or be placed in an intolerable situation if returned. The court held a hearing. Garcia testified about the severe abuse she had experienced. Ischiu and multiple family members denied the abuse but appeared to have coordinated false narratives. Evidence was also introduced that the child had witnessed and was aware of the abuse.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Chuang, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.