Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 18,400+ case briefs...

Lukens v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
945 F.2d 92 (1991)


Lukens (plaintiff) possessed a 4.6-percent interest in the Univestors partnership, which purchased timeshare units in vacation homes. In 1981, the Univestors purchased 27 units at $3,600 each. The Univestors made a total down payment of $21,600, and agreed to pay $570 per unit per year for 10 years toward the payment of interest. After 30 years, because the debt was nonrecourse, the partnership would have the option of either forfeiting its interest in the units or making a balloon payment of $86,700 to complete the purchase. In 1981, Lukens claimed a $7,179.54 deduction on his federal income-tax return, representing his proportional share of the partnership’s loss for his $993 contribution to the total down payment. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue (defendant) issued a deficiency notice on Lukens’s taxes and disallowing the deduction. Lukens appealed the commissioner’s decision. The tax court concluded that each unit had a market value of only $919, and that the units would never appreciate in value to equal the balloon payment due after 30 years. The court found that Lukens would therefore inevitably forfeit his interest rather than make the balloon payment. On this basis, the court concluded that the debt incurred by Univestors was not a genuine debt, and thus did not give rise to interest deductions for tax purposes. It was clear that Lukens would have received no benefit from purchasing the timeshares unless he was able to claim the tax write-offs. For this reason, the court held that the timeshare unit purchase constituted a sham. Lukens appealed.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (King, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 496,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 496,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 18,400 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial