Lummis v. Lilly
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
385 Mass. 41, 429 N.E.2d 1146 (1982)

- Written by Alex Ruskell, JD
Facts
Lilly (defendant) applied for a license to build a stone groin on his beachfront property. A groin was a structure that blocked sand drifting on the shore, thus adding sand to one beach while prohibiting replacement sand on another. Ultimately, the beach with the groin would widen, while the beach without one would narrow. Lummis (plaintiff), the neighboring beach owner, sued to have the groin removed. The court dismissed Lummis’s complaint through summary judgment. Lummis appealed, arguing that Lilly’s property was subject to the reasonable-use doctrine and courts had to take the elements of reasonable use into account when determining the lawful use of littoral property.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Nolan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.