Lundberg v. State

255 N.E.2d 177 (1969)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Lundberg v. State

New York Court of Appeals
255 N.E.2d 177 (1969)

KL

Facts

John Sandilands was an engineering technician employed by the New York State Department of Public Works. Sandilands’s job was based in Buffalo, where Sandilands lived. However, Sandilands was temporarily assigned to a job 80 miles away in Salamanca. Sandilands’s employer paid for Sandilands to stay in a hotel during the week and for his travel to and from home on the weekends. One Monday morning, as Sandilands was driving from home to the jobsite in Salamanca, his car skidded and struck a car being driven by John Lundberg. Lundberg died from the injuries he sustained in the accident. Sandilands obtained workers’-compensation benefits for his injuries. Lundberg’s widow (plaintiff) brought suit against the state of New York (the state) (defendant) for wrongful death and pain and suffering. The trial court awarded a judgment in favor of Lundberg’s widow. The appellate court affirmed the judgment, and the state appealed. Lundberg’s widow argued on appeal that driving to and from a temporary job assignment should be considered within the scope of employment because in workers’-compensation cases, employees injured while driving to and from temporary jobsites are entitled to benefits.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Scileppi, J.)

Dissent (Burke, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 819,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 819,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 819,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership