Luster v. Vilsack

667 F.3d 1089 (2011)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Luster v. Vilsack

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
667 F.3d 1089 (2011)

Facts

Anita Luster (plaintiff) worked for the United States Forest Service (Forest Service). She filed an Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) complaint alleging workplace discrimination based on sex. Rosenbluth, an attorney for the Forest Service, faxed several documents that contained Luster’s name and details of her EEO claim to Crespin, a Forest Service official. The fax machine to which Rosenbluth sent the documents was accessible to numerous Forest Service employees. However, all but one of the documents included a cover letter stating that the document was privileged and confidential. There was no evidence that anyone other than Crespin received or read the documents. Additionally, Crespin only ever shared one of the documents. It was notice of the EEO hearing date, and Crespin provided it only to the two employees who were to testify at the hearing. Nevertheless, when Luster eventually sued Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture Tom Vilsack, Luster added a claim alleging violation of the Privacy Act to her claim alleging workplace discrimination. She argued that Rosenbluth’s transmission of the documents to a fax machine accessible to persons not authorized to view the documents violated the Privacy Act. The district court granted summary judgment in Vilsack’s favor, and Luster appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Anderson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership