Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Lyeth v. Hoey

United States Supreme Court
305 U.S. 188 (1938)


Facts

After the death of his grandmother in 1931, the petitioner (defendant) was deemed one of several heirs to her estate. The grandmother’s will left small legacies to each of her heirs and left the remainder of her estate, which equaled to over $3,000,000, to the trustees of the Endowment Trust. The grandmother’s heirs contested the will in probate court, alleging lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence. Before a jury could hear the case, the parties entered into a compromise agreement by which the bequest to the Endowment Fund was invalidated. Under the terms of the compromise agreement, the heirs received $200,000, the Endowment Fund received $200,000, and the heirs and the trustees of the Endowment Fund equally divided the remainder of the estate. The probate court approved the compromise agreement and the petitioner received his share of the estate in 1933. The Commissioner valued the petitioner’s share at $141,484.03 and deemed it income. The petitioner paid a $56,389.65 tax on the amount and subsequently filed a claim for a refund. The claim was rejected. The petitioner then brought suit in the District Court, which held in his favor. The Court of Appeals, relying on Massachusetts inheritance law, reversed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Hughes, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 178,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.