Lyle R. Goetz v. The Honorable Matthew Crosson
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
967 F.2d 29 (1992)
- Written by Monica Rottermann , JD
Facts
A psychiatrist must testify in support of civil involuntary-commitment proceedings in New York. The law also allows a judge to appoint an independent psychiatrist to examine the patient and testify about the patient’s mental state. Lyle R. Goetz (plaintiff), an indigent patient, argued that the Due Process Clause required the state to provide a consulting psychiatrist in order to avoid erroneous commitments. Goetz also argued against the sufficiency of the law’s procedures for the appointment of an independent doctor because independent psychiatrists were rarely utilized; only one expert was available in the county, which resulted in significant delays in hearings; and few psychiatrists were willing to be court-appointed due to the limited compensation available. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the state’s chief court administrator, the Honorable Matthew Crosson (defendant), on Goetz’s first claim and did not consider his second claim. Goetz appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Winter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
