Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Lynch v. Hamrick

Supreme Court of Alabama
968 So. 2d 11 (2007)


Facts

Juanita Lynch (plaintiff) asked her daughter Rebecca Hamrick (defendant) to take her to an attorney to revise Lynch’s will and convey a 40-acre tract of land to Hamrick. Hamrick selected Julie Wills, an attorney who specialized in elder law. Hamrick and Lynch met with Wills in person at Wills’s office. During the meeting, Hamrick gave Wills a document showing that Lynch had divided her estate evenly between her children. After the initial meeting, Wills called Lynch to speak with her alone. Wills was satisfied that the will and deed were in accordance with Lynch’s wishes and prepared the documents. Afterward, Lynch executed the deed. A few days later, Lynch’s son Buddy learned that Lynch had conveyed the tract of land to Hamrick. Buddy, acting as Lynch’s attorney-in-fact, sued to set aside the deed, alleging that Hamrick tricked Lynch into signing the deed. Lynch intervened in the action on her own behalf. Lynch asked the court to set aside the deed, because she signed it based on Hamrick’s representations that she would take care of Lynch. Hamrick gave notice that she planned to depose Wills. Lynch moved to quash the deposition based on the attorney-client privilege. The trial court found that the events around the preparation and execution of the deed were not covered by the attorney-client privilege. Wills testified at trial, and the trial court ultimately declined to set aside the deed, finding that Lynch failed to show that part of the consideration for the conveyance was Hamrick’s promise of support. Lynch appealed, arguing that the trial court should not have admitted Wills’s testimony, because Lynch’s conversation with Wills was covered by the attorney-client privilege.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (See, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.