Lyondell Chemical Co. v. Centerpoint Energy Gas Services
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York
402 B.R. 571 (2009)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
LyondellBasell Industries AF S.C.A. (LBIAF) was a holding company organized in the Netherlands, but its principal place of business was in Luxembourg. LBIAF was part of a complex corporate structure encompassing numerous entities and integrated operations in multiple countries. Various indirect subsidiaries of LBIAF did business in the United States (the American subsidiaries) (debtors) and entered into commercial transactions in which the American subsidiaries later failed to honor their obligations. The counterparties to these transactions (the guaranty creditors) obtained claims guaranteed by LBIAF. LBIAF was also the principal obligor on a series of notes guaranteed by LBIAF subsidiaries in both Europe and the United States. The notes were secured by shares of LBIAF’s sole direct subsidiary, Basell Funding S.a.r.l., which itself had several direct and indirect subsidiaries, mostly based in Europe. The American subsidiaries filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, which triggered a default under the notes’ indenture agreement. LBIAF also defaulted on payment of the notes, though evidence suggested that this was curable. Subjecting LBIAF to an involuntary insolvency proceeding in Europe was a possibility, but this carried the potential to liquidate LBIAF and ultimately force various European affiliates into their own insolvency proceedings in as many as eight countries. The American subsidiaries sought to preliminarily enjoin the guaranty creditors from pursuing remedies against LBIAF.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gerber, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 833,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.