Lyons v. Baptist School of Christian Training
Maine Supreme Judicial Court
804 A.2d 364 (2002)
- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
The Baptist School of Christian Training (defendant) owned two lots, one in the Town of Chapman and one in the Town of Mapleton. The Chapman lot was approximately 150 acres and used to have a residence and an area cultivated for potatoes and other crops. The residence was demolished in the 1940s, and the cultivated areas have been overgrown. The Baptist School operated a summer camp for children on the Mapleton lot and constructed a number of buildings and open areas for camp activities and recreation. A private road called Baptist Park Road ran through the Chapman lot to the Mapleton lot. The Town of Mapleton maintained the portion of Baptist Park Road running through Mapleton as a public right-of-way. Landowners in Chapman used Baptist Park Road to travel across the Baptist School property to access a stream and other properties in Mapleton, and to hunt, fish, snowmobile, and for other recreational activities. In 2000, Baptist School became concerned about abusive uses of their property by all-terrain vehicles and other four-wheel-drive vehicles. Baptist School erected a barrier preventing access to Baptist Park Road on the Chapman lot. Owners of land near the Chapman lot (plaintiffs) sued Baptist School, alleging that a public easement by prescription had been established on the Baptist Park Road in Chapman. The trial court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, and Baptist School appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Alexander, J.)
Dissent (Calkins, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.