Lytle v. Bexar County, Texas
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
560 F.3d 404 (2009)
- Written by Kyli Cotten, JD
Facts
Sheriff’s Deputy Robert O’Donnell (defendant) attempted to pull over a Ford Taurus in which Heather Lytle (plaintiff) was a passenger. The driver was suspected of having stolen the Taurus. When Deputy O’Donnell turned his emergency lights on, the driver failed to yield, and a high-speed chase ensued. At one point, the driver collided with an oncoming vehicle and came to a temporary stop. At this point, Deputy O’Donnell exited his police cruiser and the Taurus began moving in reverse toward Deputy O’Donnell before pulling forward again to flee. As the Taurus went forward, Deputy O’Donnell fired two shots into the Taurus, striking and killing Lytle. Her family brought suit individually, and on her behalf, claiming that Deputy O’Donnell had used excessive force that violated Lytle’s Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable seizure. Deputy O’Donnell argued that his use of force was reasonable given the threat of harm the Taurus posed to himself and the public generally. Deputy O’Donnell moved to dismiss the suit based on qualified immunity. The district court denied his motion, and Deputy O’Donnell entered an interlocutory appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Prado, J.)
Dissent (Smith, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.