Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

M.H. and J.L.H. v. Caritas Family Services

Supreme Court of Minnesota
488 N.W.2d 282 (Minn. 1992)


Facts

M.H. and J.L.H. (plaintiffs), a married couple, adopted an infant boy, C.H., from Caritas Family Services (Caritas) (defendant), a Catholic social-service agency. Caritas informed the plaintiffs that C.H. had some history of incest in his background. As C.H. grew older, the plaintiffs witnessed serious behavioral and emotional problems and requested information regarding C.H.’s genetic background as part of his ongoing medical treatment and therapy. Caritas provided the plaintiffs with a document stating that C.H.’s parents were siblings. Caritas also disclosed that C.H.’s father was in good health but was hyperactive and had low intelligence and mental-health issues. The plaintiffs filed suit against Caritas, asserting claims of intentional and negligent misrepresentation. Specifically, the plaintiffs claimed that Caritas had known but failed to disclose the relationship and medical histories of C.H.’s genetic parents. Caritas moved for summary judgment. The plaintiffs amended their complaint to add allegations of intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress and a claim for punitive damages. The trial court granted Caritas’s motion for summary judgment intentional misrepresentation and emotional distress claims but denied summary judgment as to the negligent-misrepresentation claim. The plaintiffs appealed. The appellate court reversed. The Supreme Court of Minnesota granted certiorari to review.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Wahl, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.