United States District Court for the District of Columbia
216 F.R.D. 133 (D.D.C. 2002)
Six former employees of the CIA (plaintiffs) brought suit against the CIA and its director (defendants) for obstruction of counsel and violations of the Privacy Act. Specifically, the plaintiffs alleged that they were discriminated against by the CIA and that the CIA improperly denied the plaintiffs’ attorney access to CIA employee records. In addition, the plaintiffs claimed that the employee records were maintained illegally under the terms of the Privacy Act. In their second amended complaint, the plaintiffs proposed to add information about their existing claims as well as add nine plaintiffs to their claim. The defendants moved to sever the claims of the original six plaintiffs, and to deny the plaintiffs’ proposed joinder of the nine new plaintiffs.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Urbina, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 222,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.