M. Kraus & Bros. v. United States
United States Supreme Court
327 U.S. 614, 66 S. Ct. 705, 90 L. Ed. 894 (1945)
- Written by David Bloom, JD
Facts
[Editor’s Note: The casebook excerpt lists the year of this case as 1945, but the decision was filed in 1946.] M. Kraus & Bros. (Kraus) (plaintiff) was a meat and poultry seller. The United States government (United States) (defendant) charged Kraus and its president with violating the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, a statute intended to maintain price stability and control inflation during food shortages. The United States price administrator issued a regulation under the Emergency Price Control Act that made evading price ceilings imposed on commodities illegal. Poultry was a primary commodity subject to statutory price ceilings. The United States accused Kraus and its president of circumventing the price ceiling on poultry by requiring customers who wanted to purchase poultry also to buy secondary commodities, such as chicken feet and skin. Such tying arrangements, also called combination sales, were not specifically addressed by the price administrator’s regulation prohibiting price-ceiling evasion. At trial, no evidence was submitted as to what value, if any, the secondary commodities had. Kraus’s president was acquitted, but Kraus was convicted and ordered to pay monetary fines. Kraus appealed the conviction. The intermediate appellate court affirmed the conviction. Kraus petitioned to set aside the conviction.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Murphy, J.)
Dissent (Black, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.