M & M Leasing Corp. v. Seattle First National Bank
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
563 F.2d 1377 (1977)
- Written by Robert Cane, JD
Facts
Seattle First National Bank (Seattle First) and Peoples National Bank of Washington (Peoples Bank) (defendants) were in the business of motor-vehicle leasing and the leasing of other personal property. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the comptroller) (defendant) approved of the practice of leasing by First National and Peoples Bank. M & M Leasing Corporation and several other companies (leasing companies) (plaintiffs) were primarily in the business of motor-vehicle leasing. A motor-vehicle lease functions as follows. Car dealers generate leases pursuant to an agreement that a bank will lease the automobile to a dealer’s customer. The lessee assumes all operating costs and risks. The bank extends credit, which is secured by a lien on the underlying property (i.e., the automobile). The leasing companies sued Seattle First, Peoples Bank, and the comptroller, arguing that the leasing of motor vehicles and other personal property is not authorized by the National Bank Act. The district court entered judgment in favor of the leasing companies and enjoined the banks from engaging in certain leasing transactions. Seattle First, Peoples Bank, and the comptroller appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sneed, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.