Mabry v. Lee County
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
849 F.3d 232 (2017)
- Written by Caitlinn Raimo, JD
Facts
T.M. was a 12-year-old child who was involved in a physical altercation with another student at her middle school. The school’s resource officer determined there was probable cause to arrest T.M. and charge her with assault, disorderly conduct, and disruption of a school session. T.M. was removed from school property, handcuffed, and patted down, then transported to the county’s juvenile detention center (the center). The center’s policy was that all juveniles were patted down and searched for weapons with a metal detector. In addition, those charged with theft, drug, or violent offenses who would be placed in the center’s general population were subject to a visual strip and cavity search. Because T.M. was charged with a violent offense, she was searched pursuant to this policy. She was placed in the general population and released later that evening, and no charges were pursued against her. Nicole Mabry (plaintiff), T.M.’s mother, sued Lee County (the county) (defendant) on T.M.’s behalf. The county moved for summary judgment, which the court granted, and Mabry appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Clement, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.