Madden v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals

552 P.2d 1178 (1976)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Madden v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals

California Supreme Court
552 P.2d 1178 (1976)

Facts

Terry Madden (plaintiff) was a state employee. The state had a board that negotiated healthcare plans for the state’s employees. Madden enrolled in the board’s Kaiser Foundation Health Plan (Kaiser) (defendant), which did not have an arbitration provision. A few years later, Kaiser sent all plan participants notice that an arbitration provision was going to be added requiring all claims about the plan to go to private arbitration instead of being filed with a court of law. After negotiations between the board and Kaiser, the expected arbitration provision was added to the plan. Madden claimed she never received the notice or had any knowledge that an arbitration provision was added to the plan. However, if Madden had looked at her plan, she would have noticed that the board had provided alternative healthcare-plan options that did not include arbitration provisions. Madden then had a hysterectomy at Kaiser. During the surgery, Madden’s bladder was cut, and she required blood transfusions. Madden was infected with hepatitis from a transfusion. Madden sued Kaiser and the blood bank (defendant) for medical malpractice. Kaiser moved to compel the claim to private arbitration, but Madden argued that she had never personally agreed to arbitrate anything. The trial court denied the motion, and Kaiser appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Tobriner, J.)

Dissent (Mosk, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership