From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...
Maddox v. State
Arkansas Supreme Court
931 S.W.2d 438 (1996)
Less than four months before turning 18, Kristy Maddox (defendant) was charged with criminal mischief for throwing a glass soda bottle at a car. Kristy requested transfer to juvenile court. Two witnesses appeared at the hearing. Kristy’s mother, Pamela, said Kristy lived at home, helped around the house while she pursued her GED, and planned to attend college. Pamela said that they had a good relationship, but that she called the police once for an undisclosed family disturbance. The second witness was Sherry Kinnamon, whose car Kristy hit with the bottle. Kinnamon was driving with two passengers in her car when a truck started tailgating her. The truck repeatedly pulled alongside her car with its occupants yelling obscenities, but it would not pass, even when Kinnamon slowed to a crawl. Kinnamon said that when she finally sped back up, the truck pulled alongside her, and Kristy leaned out the window and threw the bottle, denting Kinnamon’s hood and cracking her windshield. The trial judge found Kristy’s act both serious and violent. The judge emphasized that the incident was harassing and referred to another incident in which a person was killed because someone threw something at his car. The judge also noted Kristy had no prior criminal record and said no evidence had been introduced regarding her likelihood of rehabilitation. The judge nonetheless denied transfer to juvenile court. Kristy appealed, arguing that the judge did not recognize her mother’s testimony related to her prospects for rehabilitation, and that criminal mischief is a property crime, not a violent crime. The prosecution countered that criminal mischief is a felony, Kristy’s act was violent, and rehabilitation was irrelevant absent any showing that Kristy was remorseful or accepted responsibility for her acts. Finally, the prosecution argued that Kristy’s turning 18 before the hearing was enough by itself to try her as an adult.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Brown, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 616,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 616,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.