From our private database of 26,900+ case briefs...
Madison Gas and Electric Co. v. Commissioner
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
633 F.2d 512 (1980)
Madison Gas and Electric Co. (Madison) (plaintiff) was a public utility that produced and distributed electricity. In 1967 Madison entered into an agreement with Wisconsin Public Service Corporation and Wisconsin Power and Light Co. (collectively, the companies) to construct and operate a nuclear generating plant, the Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant (the power plant). The companies owned the power plant as tenants in common with unequal ownership interests. The companies intended to create a tenancy in common, not a partnership. Electricity produced by the power plant was divided based on each company’s ownership interest for each company to sell for its individual profit. Operation and maintenance costs also were distributed among the companies according to their ownership interests. In 1969 and 1970, Madison contributed to costs related to the hiring and training of employees, the establishment of internal procedures and guidelines for the power plant’s operation, and other related expenses necessary for the operation of the power plant. Madison claimed a tax deduction on its income-tax returns for 1969 and 1970, classifying the costs as necessary business expenses. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue (the Commissioner) (defendant) disallowed the deduction. The Commissioner believed that the costs were capital expenditures related to the start-up of a new partnership. The United States Tax Court upheld the Commissioner’s determination, and Madison appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Cummings, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 540,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 540,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 26,900 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.