From our private database of 28,500+ case briefs...
Madison v. Chalmette Refining, L.L.C.
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
637 F.3d 551 (2011)
A number of students, supervised by parents and teachers, participated in a historical reenactment at the Chalmette National Battlefield, which was adjacent to the Chalmette Refinery. That afternoon, petroleum coke dust was released from the refinery and allegedly traveled over the battlefield. Five attendees or parents of attendees at the reenactment (plaintiffs) sued Chalmette Refining, L.L.C. (Chalmette) (defendant), seeking damages for, inter alia, personal injury, pain and suffering, psychological harm, evacuation, economic losses, and property losses. Plaintiffs sought class certification under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 23(b)(3), seeking to represent all injured persons who had been at the battlefield at the time of the incident. As part of discovery regarding certification, Chalmette deposed the named representatives. The plaintiffs conducted no discovery. More than two years later, the court held a certification hearing at which no evidence was introduced. The court orally granted certification after the hearing. Approximately two months later, the court issued a written order on its decision, stating that the predominant issue was whether class members were at the battlefield or not and exposed or not. The court further stated that any individual issues relating to damages could be reserved for resolution on an individualized basis. In support of its decision, the court cited two cases in which certification had been granted. Chalmette appealed pursuant to FRCP 23(f), which authorizes interlocutory appeals of class-certification decisions.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Clement, J.)
Concurrence (Dennis, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 545,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 545,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.