Madrid v. Spears

220 F.2d 51 (1957)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Madrid v. Spears

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
220 F.2d 51 (1957)

Facts

Spears (plaintiff) brought suit to quiet title to a one-half interest in a tract of real property. Spears alleged that a deed purportedly conveying her interest in the property had been forged. Madrid (defendant) had occupied the property and made improvements upon the property over a four year period. Spears conceded that Madrid was entitled to compensation for the value of improvements, but asserted that any such compensation should be offset by profits earned from Madrid’s use of the wrongfully possessed property. The trial court concluded that Madrid was entitled to credit for one half the value of the improvements. The trial court did not award an offset for profits arising from Madrid’s use of the land because it had no evidence of the difference in rental value between the land with improvements and the land in its unimproved state. The court partitioned the property and placed a lien against Spears’ parcel in the amount awarded to Madrid as credit for improvements. Madrid appealed and argued that the appropriate measure of compensation for improvements should not be based on the actual value of the improvements, but on the increase in value to the property as a whole resulting from the improvements. Spears also appealed and argued that the trial court erred in failing to award her an offset for profits arising from Madrid’s use of the property.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Murrah, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 807,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership