Maersk Olie & Gas A/S v. Firma M. de Haan en W. de Boer
European Union Court of Justice
[2004] E.C.R. I-09657, Case C-39/02 (2004)
- Written by David Bloom, JD
Facts
Maersk Olie & Gas A/S (Maersk) (plaintiff) had underwater oil and gas pipelines in the North Sea. A fishing trawler owned by M. de Haan and W. de Boer (the shipowners) (defendants) caused damages to the pipelines. Maersk notified the shipowners by letter that the shipowners were responsible for the damages. The shipowners filed an action in the Netherlands, asking the Netherlands court to place a cap on the damages owed to Maersk pursuant a treaty that limited the liability of owners of ships. The Netherlands court issued an order in favor of the shipowners, limiting the amount of damages that the shipowners were liable for and establishing a liability-limitation fund. Maersk appealed the decision of the Netherlands court, refused to submit a claim for compensation under the liability-limitation funds, and filed a separate action for damages against the shipowners in a Denmark court. Denmark and the Netherlands were members of the European Union. The Denmark court declined to exercise jurisdiction on the ground that Maersk’s action was a prohibited parallel proceeding. Maersk appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 791,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.