Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Magayanes v. Terrance

739 F.2d 1131 (1983)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
M
From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...

Magayanes v. Terrance

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

739 F.2d 1131 (1983)

Facts

In 1979, Ramon Magayanes (plaintiff) was arrested for disorderly conduct by four police officers employed by the City of Chicago (city) (defendants). During the arrest, Magayanes was placed in a squadrol vehicle to be transported to the nearest police station. Upon arriving at the station, the officers found Magayanes on the floor of the squadrol with blood around his nose and lips. Magayanes was then taken to a hospital where he became more belligerent and refused treatment. Magayanes subsequently filed suit against the city under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, claiming that the city used a defectively designed squadrol vehicle. At trial, Magayanes sought to introduce testimony from a witness named Franklin. Franklin’s testimony was expected to be that Franklin was arrested by the city in 1980 and placed in a squadrol where he was shackled to the vehicle after being severely beaten by officers. The district court excluded Franklin’s testimony pursuant to a motion in limine, ruling that the evidence was both irrelevant and prejudicial. A jury returned a verdict in favor of the city, and Magayanes appealed, arguing that the district court had abused its discretion in excluding Franklin’s testimony.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wyatt, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 605,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 605,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 605,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 33,800 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Evidence

Key Terms