Magee v. Rose
Delaware Superior Court
405 A.2d 143 (1979)
- Written by Lauren Petersen, JD
Facts
Joann Magee and Marion Rose (defendant) had a common-law marriage. Joann had a daughter named Shauna from another relationship. Joann and Marion had a son together, Marion Magee. The family lived together in Angola, Delaware. While driving all together, Marion Rose crashed their car. Joann appeared lifeless from the moment of the accident, and was pronounced dead at a hospital 25 minutes after the crash. After the accident, Joann’s parents adopted Shauna. Marion Rose and his parents cared for Marion Magee. Joann’s estate (plaintiff) sued Marion Rose under Delaware’s wrongful death and survival statutes. The estate did not present any evidence regarding Joann’s suffering from the time of the car accident until her death. The survival statute allowed a plaintiff to seek damages for conscious pain and suffering from the time of injury until death. The wrongful-death statute allowed a plaintiff to seek damages for the pecuniary loss caused by the decedent’s death. Marion Rose moved for summary judgment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Tease, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.