Magness v. Superior Court

278 P.3d 259 (2012)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Magness v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court
278 P.3d 259 (2012)

KL

Facts

One evening, homeowner Timothy Loop was in his house when he heard his garage door opening. He looked outside and saw Christopher Magness (defendant) standing near the end of Loop’s driveway. Magness ran, and Loop chased him until Magness ran into a nearby home. Loop called police, who arrested Magness, and Magness was charged with attempted burglary and burglary of a home. During the investigation, police found Loop’s garage-door remote control on the end of his driveway near where Magness had been standing. Loop stated that he had locked the opener in his car, which was parked outside his house, and police also found that the car-window seal had been peeled back and the window had been pushed down a few inches, suggesting that Magness broke into the car to get the opener. Before trial, Magness asked the magistrate to reduce the charge to attempted burglary because he did not actually enter Loop’s home and complete a burglary. The magistrate refused, ruling that opening the garage door constituted an entry. Magness filed a writ of prohibition seeking to overturn the magistrate’s ruling, and the court of appeals agreed with Magness. The prosecution filed a petition to the California Supreme Court seeking further review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Liu, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership